Koios

Religion is a cultural thing

Comments

[this is good]

I get what you are saying and agree with it to a great extent. I only wish I had those words in my mouth when I was trying to explain to my husbands' pastor why she should marry us when I don't necessarily beleive in "God".Unfortunately, I do not believe religions will ever be able to co-exist peacefully and fear what will come of future man as someone always thinks they are a better person than the next.

Just a question where do you think we go when we are no longer apart of this world? I find myself very conflicted with the thought of that as I was raised christian, and it honestly scares me to think I could possibly (if I am wrong in my thoughts) be tempting my own celestial fate.

I think religions will be able to co-exist, but of course this implies that we get away from traditional religion and move towards a rational type of religion.

To answer your question, I think we simply die. I do not bother myself with concepts of the after-life because which after-life would I believe in? Rebirth? Muslim or Christian after-life?

I think this viewpoint makes life more beautiful. We have one life to live. Are we living it the way we want to? Cherish this life. It's the only one we have. Worrying about the after-life does nothing to better this life. It only makes us worry, which is never a good thing. :)

I reckon I can go with the "one life" theory, Koios.

I'd like to think folk are more careful with their life and those of others when they only have one life to live.

Is there a Politician or a Priest worth the total destruction of my being? I can't think of one.

I can't think of one either ;)

[this is good]
I agree with your reasoning, but I submit that religion may be both heartless and absurd.
I'm glad you escaped.
Ever think about doing a podcast?
I think most of the reasoning you listed serves as evidence for the human source of god(s) and religion. This, combined with the lack of physical evidence for a creator, is the foundation for my atheism.

I also agree with you that religious absolutism is always absurd, and frequently heartless. Nevertheless, harsh criticism of those who practice religious absolutism can often alienate not only the religiously absolute(potentially endangering your life, depending on where in the world you live), but also those who have considered practicing it at any time in their lives(they feel as though we who criticize consider ourselves superior, thus alienating them) and those who have friends or family that practice religious absolutism.

So yes, I agree that religious absolutism in and of itself is wholly irrational and often downright dangerous, yet I think it is worth noting that those who practice religious absolutism are still capable of rational thinking. The trick- or the quandary rather- is to get them to perform the exercise that you suggest under the title of their blog : "ask yourself why." This becomes an exercise less in logic and reasoning and more in knowledge of and skill at communicating.

Religion most certainly can be both heartless and absurd. However, I wouldn't say this is always the case.

I've never thought about doing a podcast, but that is definitely a good idea.

[this is good]
I completely agree. Most religious people--and I suppose people in general--takes assumptions and make them fact without ever asking "Why am I making these assumptions fact?" or "What reasoning do I have to do so?" People who practice religious absolutism are definitely capable of rational thinking. The trick is to get them to start "thinking." This can only be done with one's assumptions are challenged. I wouldn't necessarily say that this exercise becomes less in logic and reasoning and more in knowledge of and skill at communicating. Instead, I would say that this exercise's foundation is in logic and reasoning but that the skill of communicating is immensely important.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Advertisement